Forbes Real Time

LGBTQ Creators Sue YouTube For Alleged Discrimination

Complaints from LGBTQ creators against YouTube have been piling up for years. (Photo by Olly Curtis)

Future Publishing via Getty Images

A group of LGBTQ YouTubers have alleged in a federal lawsuit that YouTube and its parent company Google discriminate against LGBTQ creators by unfairly restricting their ability to make money from advertising and purposefully making it more difficult for their videos to reach a wider audience.

The group of five YouTubers—GNews! producers Celso Dulay and Chris Knight, Bria Kam and Chrissy Chambers, Brett Somers of WattsTheStanford, transgender YouTuber Chase Ross and Queer Kid Stuff creator Lindsay Amer—are accusing the platform of:

  • Using algorithms that unfairly demonetize videos about LGBT issues because they are flagged as “shocking,” “inappropriate,” “offensive,” and “sexually explicit” and therefore not appropriate for advertisers.
  • Blocking LGBTQ creators from purchasing ads on other videos.
  • Allowing homophobic reaction videos intended to mock and bully specific YouTubers to stay online and make money, while demonetizing videos uploaded by those who have been harassed.
  • Letting anti-LGBTQ ads run before their own videos
  • Recommending anti-LGBTQ videos in the “Up Next” section after their video is played, while excluding those from LGBTQ creators.

YouTube did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Forbes.

The Details: Celso Dulay and Chris Knight, a gay couple who produce GNews!, say in the lawsuit that YouTube has hampered their efforts to get new subscribers, which leads to them earning less advertising revenue. In the lawsuit, they say YouTube in 2017 prohibited them from buying ads to promote their own LGBTQ holiday video because it was labeled as “shocking content.” They say a Google employee told them the video was flagged because it discussed being gay.

Transgender YouTuber Chase Ross also claims in the lawsuit that innocuous videos that merely mention or tag the words “gay,” “lesbian,” “bisexual” or “transgender” get demonetized or put under the “Restricted Mode” filter, a setting that, when turned on, allows YouTube to block inappropriate videos. Ross told Forbes a video he posted about the lawsuit Wednesday was demonetized immediately (it was remonetized a few hours later).

“This is about making sure we’re not censored as a community,” Ross said. “I found YouTube at 15 and it saved my life. I hear from people every day that they want to make a channel, but they’re afraid of getting their content restricted. It really breaks my heart.”

Lindsay Amer, who identifies as non-binary and uses they/them pronouns, claims that YouTube allowed homophobic harassment in the comments section of their videos after neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer posted about them. Amer’s channel, Queer Kids Stuff, features educational videos about LGBTQ issues for children.

It got to the point where Amer had to disable comments altogether after having to block more than 10 different spellings of the word “pedophile.” Amer says disabling comments hurt them financially because the number of comments is a metric YouTube uses to measure a video’s engagement.

Response: Bria Kam and Chrissy Chambers, a couple who are also part of the lawsuit, said the response has been overwhelmingly positive because the lawsuit adds some teeth to complaints that have been ongoing for years.

When they do see a negative comment, it’s usually someone claiming that YouTube’s algorithms hurt everyone, not just LGBTQ creators.

“Yes, other people and groups are being discriminated against, but we’re focusing on this part of the community because we’re part of it,” Chambers told Forbes.

Key Background: YouTube has been dogged by complaints about how it treats LGBTQ creators for years, but the issue came to a head in June after the company’s inconsistent and confusing response to Vox journalist’s Carlos Maza’s public callout of homophobic harassment by right-wing YouTuber Steven Crowder. In the end, YouTube demonetized his channel instead of removing it entirely.

The debacle led to a group of Google employees attempting to get their own company float banned from San Francisco’s Pride celebration using the hashtag #NoPrideInYT.

Rachel Sandler, Forbes Staff

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *